Every representation makes some relationships easier to see and others harder to judge.
Lesson 03 · StatisticsYour learning goal
Identify and explain strengths and limitations of graphs representing the same data.
What can a reader compare accurately?
Bar lengths measured from a common zero baseline make category differences relatively easy to compare. A table provides exact recorded values. A circle graph foregrounds part-to-whole relationships, but close sector sizes can be difficult to distinguish. A strong critique names the task: exact comparison, trend, share of a total or a pattern across groups.
A limitation is not automatically an error
A correctly labelled circle graph can accurately show survey shares while being less useful for comparing two nearly equal categories. That is a limitation, not proof of dishonesty. An actual error occurs when values, proportions, scales or labels misrepresent the evidence. Explain which problem you mean and why it matters.
Symbols need a key
A pictograph can make counts inviting and memorable. The key defines the amount represented by one symbol. Partial symbols may require estimation, especially when a value is not a convenient multiple of the key. Enlarging a symbol in both width and height changes its area, which can exaggerate differences even if its height matches the data.
Group comparisons need a common frame
Double bar graphs help compare two groups across categories, but they need a clear legend and shared units. Two separate graphs can conceal different scales. Before comparing heights, check whether each graph uses the same minimum, maximum, interval and time period. Also distinguish counts from rates when the groups have different sizes.
Explore · predict, test, explain
Make your thinking visible.
Graph Lab
Enter one label and value per line, separated by a comma. This tool supports 2–12 non-negative values. The table and graph always use the same data.
Line graphs use equally spaced positions here: use observations at equal time intervals. Do not use a line to connect unrelated categories. Circle graphs require a positive total.
Worked examples
Follow the reasoning.
Nearly equal survey shares
A class of 40 reports 15, 14 and 11 preferences in three exclusive categories.
A circle graph shows 37.5%, 35% and 27.5% of the whole.
The first two sectors may look almost equal; a bar graph with values shows the one-person difference clearly.
Both displays can be accurate. Choose based on the reader’s question.
A pictograph key of 10
A category count of 25 needs 2.5 symbols when one symbol represents 10.
Two full symbols and half a symbol represent 25.
Three full symbols would represent 30, not 25.
A table or labelled bar graph avoids estimating the partial symbol.
Guided Practice
Build an explanation.
A circle graph has accurate percentages but no total. Can you find the number of people in a category?
Give me a hint
20% of which amount?
Compare a worked response
You can compare shares but cannot recover counts without the total. For example, 20% could mean 4 of 20 or 40 of 200.
One school has 60 cyclists out of 600 students; another has 40 out of 200. Which has the greater cycling share?
Give me a hint
Calculate each percentage rather than comparing counts alone.
Compare a worked response
The shares are 10% and 20%. The first school has more cyclists, but the second has a greater proportion. Name the comparison your graph is designed to support.
Independent Practice
Test the idea, then check your reasoning.
Feedback explains your chosen response. These activities are practice, not a school mark.
Connections
Use it beyond this page.
Before sharing a chart, ask a partner to answer your intended question in ten seconds. If they struggle, improve the representation without changing the evidence.
Take it further
Explain when a table is more useful than any graph. Then explain what a graph can reveal more quickly than a table of the same numbers.